World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth in Cochabamba
Emma Dolan, Christian Aid’s contry manager for Bolivia reports from the conference
Day Three, Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Today’s debate centered around the rights of Mother Earth. The first session was opened by two eminent liberation theologians and inspirational men – Leonardo Boff and Miguel D Escoto, who have dedicate their lives to fighting injustice and for the rights of the abused and downtrodden across the world. And still the fight. They fight now for the future of humanity that depends totally on this planet, a planet which is being hurt through the predatory and exploitative development models that treat natural resources as expendable commodities.
Alberto Acosta, ex Minister for Energy in Ecuador and a key actor in mainstreaming the rights of Mother Earth in the countries new constitution, referred the sacredness of the Planet, how we should venerate her and respect her as a Mother from which all life grows. He also referred to when Jesus Christ kicked out the salesmen in the temple – in a reference to big business and government who are desecrating the sacredness of the Mother Earth through ever increasing greed and exploitation.
This debate continue into the afternoon, in the plenary sessions of the working groups which have been coordinating virtually over the internet over the past three months receiving inputs from people and organisations that have come to Cochabamba and other who are following the vents from a distance this week. The working groups in which are partners have participated have worked tirelessly over the past few days, often late into the night with the objective of presenting agreed position papers to the social movements and the participating Heads of State who will be flying into Bolivia tomorrow.
There was great confusion about where the venue for the plenary sessions were. I walked over a mile in the midday heat to a local hotel, only to find when I got there that the venue had been changed to the place I had just come from – so I had to walk all the way back. I participated in the plenary session which presented the results of the working groups on Climate Justice Tribunals and Rights of the Mother Earth.
I was very happy to see that both presentations were led by the indigenous leaders from two of the principle peasant and indigenous movements which are founding members of the Bolivian CC Platform that we support together with OXFAM and CAFOD. Cristian Dominguez and Tata Rafael have become protagonists of social movements and indigenous groups in Bolivia and beyond, fighting and lobbying for climate justice at national and international levels. They were included in the Government delegation in Copenhagen and also participated in a delegation to the UK to speak to our campaigners and supporters in December last year.
The Climate Justice Tribunal has been spearheaded by our partner Fundación Solón which, with support from CA, OXFAM and CAFOD, undertook the first emblematic Climate Justice Tribunal in Bolivia last year, in which nine cases from different countries were presented, including one from Peru by one of our partners there. Since then the idea of institutionalizing and installing an International Climate Justice Tribunal has taken hold with social movements at international level. It is now an integral part of the government of Bolivia’s proposal to fight Climate Change and call for the end to impunity to governments, corporations and individuals which commit crimes against the planet and therefore against humanity.
There was general consensus around the results from the climate justice group – the same certainly could not be said for the next group on the rights of Mother Earth. The presentation echoed much of what had been said by the theologians in the morning about our spiritual and physical interdependence and coexistence with all living beings. However, there was a swell of thirty of more people who all wanted to comment on the draft text presented. If the truth be known, rather than make specific comments of additions to the text, it seemed to me that most people went to the mike in order to stand on a soap box and make passionate speeches to the sizeable audience of about three hundred, from everything from vegetarians to animal and plant rights etc etc… After more than an hour and a half of ranting, it was all getting out of control. The audience called loudly for the moderator too limit the interventions. In response to the moderator setting some ground rules, the people lining up behind the mike ranted with more passion and more volume refusing to withdraw and there was a free for all as they all wanted to talk over each other, interrupting and contradicting themselves. There was obvious frustration, but I felt that apart from the few people expressing particular rather weird and irrelevant ideas, most people’s views were actually expressed in the text already – just perhaps not textually or with the priority that they believed was called for.
I was sat on the floor next to a partner from India as the room was full to bursting. He seemed rather overwhelmed and expressed his surprise by the passion and fury of the shouting, whistling, foot stamping, clapping, flag waving, cheering audience and speakers. I have been living in Latin America long enough now to no longer be surprised by this long drawn out, but unquestionably energetic and completely entertaining way of watching empowered people reach consensus.